Deepak Malhotra, JD, BSEE

Inventor and US Patent Attorney

Are you looking for a partner to help protect your ideas?

Let me introduce myself. I am Deepak Malhotra. I have over 20 years experience in patent preparation and prosecution, and have successfully prosecuted hundreds of patent applications to allowance. I have worked on large portfolios for many Fortune 500 companies. Importantly, I am dedicated to strong customer service. That’s not something you experience much in the legal world – but I believe you deserve timeliness as well as quality.

(By continuing, you agree that you have read, understood, and agree to this Disclaimer and Privacy Policy.)

Deepak Malhotra, JD, BSEE

Avvo

Superb | 4 Reviews
3 Peer Endorsements
Contributor Level 11

Spokane CDA Magazine

Top Lawyers 2020 | Top Lawyers 2021
Top Lawyers 2018 | Top Lawyers 2019
Top Lawyers 2017 | Top Lawyers 2014
Top Lawyers 2016 | Top Lawyers 2013
Top Lawyers 2015 | Top Lawyers 2011

Martindale-Hubbell

5 out of 5-Preeminent
Peer Review Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence

ThreeBest Rated

Listed as one of the Top 3 Patent attorneys in Spokane, WA by ThreeBest Rated.

Software Patent Lawyer, Electronics Patent Attorney

Deepak Malhotra, JD, BSEE has worked extensively with various technologies including software, RF communications, sensors, smart cards, ESD protection, tape drivers, servo systems, printers, static memory cells, dynamic memory cells, database, publishing systems, virtual reality, wafer production methods, wafer polishing, antenna diversity systems, RF collision arbitration systems, marketing systems, electron multipliers, microwave electronics, digital clock recovery loops, secure network authentication systems, user interfaces, and more. Malhotra Law Firm, PLLC was a minority certified patent law firm, certified by the Northwest Mountain Minority Supplier Development Council.

 

 

Top Patent Prosecutor

Malhotra Law Firm, PLLC has experience in:

  • Protecting electrical, electronics, and mechanical inventions
  • Assisting venture-capital funded start ups & Fortune 500 companies
  • Helping foreign companies secure intellectual property protection in the U.S.
  • Protecting software inventions with software patents
  • International protection of inventions
Patents

Patents

In the language of the statute, any person who “invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvements thereof, may obtain a patent,” subject to the conditions and requirements of the law. These classes of subject matter taken together include practically everything made by man and the processes for making them.

Trademarks

Trademarks

The primary function of a trademark is to indicate origin. However, trademarks also serve to guarantee the quality of the goods or services and, through advertising, serve to create and maintain demand. Rights in a trademark are acquired by use or applying for a federal trademark registration before use.

Business Method Patent Considerations

Business Method Patent Considerations

Attitudes towards business method patents have swung back and forth like a pendulum but recently the Supreme Court has refused to deem business methods patent ineligible.  Business methods are generally eligible for patent protection if they pass a “Mayo/Alice” test.  The first part of the test is to determine whether the claims are directed to an abstract idea, a law of nature or a natural phenomenon (i.e., a judicial exception). If the claims are directed to a judicial exception, the second part of the Mayo test is to determine whether the claim recites additional elements that amount to significantly more than the judicial exception. Many inventions that are thought to be business method inventions are really what I consider to be software inventions.

Software Patents

Software Patents

Like it or not, software patents are here to stay! Instead of hoping that they go away, your best defense against future potential infringement threats by others is to have an arsenal of your own. The U.S. Supreme Court, in a case known as Alice v. CLS, held that using a computer to automate a well known financial method is an unpatentable abstract idea. So what types of software inventions are patent-eligible?

How to Protect Phone Apps

How to Protect Phone Apps

Are you a smart phone app developer?  If so, you will want to know what forms of intellectual property are available for protecting smart phone apps.

Provisional Patent Applications

Provisional Patent Applications

The United States has a form of patent application called a Provisional Patent Application. Some people feel that these are an easy and inexpensive way to obtain a filing date and some patent rights, but they are usually unaware of the risks and downside.

Important Changes to U.S. Patent Law:  America Invents Act (AIA)

Important Changes to U.S. Patent Law: America Invents Act (AIA)

The United States switched from a First-to-Invent system to a First-to-File system. That makes it important to file patent applications sooner rather than later.

Conducting A Patent Novelty Search

A thorough patent search is an enormous undertaking. However, you can start with a novelty search that covers the most likely languages and places.

The History of Software Patents Blog

IOENGINE, LLC v INGENICO INC., FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2024
June 29, 2024
By Deepak Malhotra

IOENGINE, LLC appealed decisions of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Office’s Patent Trial and Appeals Board that found unpatentable certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,539,047; 9,059,969; and 9,774,703. The patents relate to a tunneling client access point (TCAP) that is a “highly secure, portable, power efficient storage and…

USC IP PARTNERSHIP V META , FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2023 (SOFTWARE PATENTS)
December 12, 2023
By Deepak Malhotra

USC brought suit for infringement against Facebook, Inc. (now Meta Platforms, Inc.), asserting that its “News Feed” feature infringes claims 1–17 of U.S. Patent No. 8,645,300.  The software patent relates to a search engine software method for predicting which webpages to recommend to a web visitor based on inferences of…

TRINITY INFO MEDIA, LLC V. COVALENT, INC., FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2023 (SOFTWARE PATENTS)
September 5, 2023
By Deepak Malhotra

Trinity Info Media, LLC sued Covalent, Inc. for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,087,321 and 10,936,685 relating to methods and systems for connecting users based on their answers to polling questions. U.S. Patent No. 9,087,321 teaches that its claimed invention is “directed to a poll-based networking system that connects users…

HANTZ SOFTWARE, LLC, V SAGE INTACCT, INC., FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2023 (SOFTWARE PATENTS)
April 29, 2023
By Deepak Malhotra

Any ineligibility judgment should apply to only claims asserted in a complaint if held patent-ineligible after a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Hantz sued Sage alleging that Sage infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 8,055,559 and 8,055,560. Sage moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a…

HAWK TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS, LLC, V CASTLE RETAIL, LLC, FEDERAL CIRCUIT 2023 (SOFTWARE PATENTS)
March 24, 2023
By Deepak Malhotra

A multi-format digital video product system capable of maintaining full-bandwidth resolution while providing professional quality editing and manipulation of images, which is capable of conserving bandwidth while preserving data is not patent-eligible. Appellant Hawk Technology Systems, LLC sued Appellee Castle Retail, LLC in the Western District of Tennessee for patent…

Latest News

Text vs. Purpose: The Hughes-Reyna Divide Reaches Veterans’ Benefits in Soto
5 November 2024 | 6:09 pm

by Dennis Crouch

The Supreme Court has before it another important petition highlighting the Federal Circuit's approach to statutory interpretation and administrative authority. Soto v. US stems from a Federal Circuit appellate decision focusing on the statute of limitations for awarding back pay associated with Combat-Related Special Compensation. The Supreme Court also recently heard oral arguments in Bufkin v. McDonough, which presents another important question about veterans' benefits - specifically whether the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must independently review the VA's application of the "benefit-of-the-doubt" rule in veterans' cases. The University of Missouri Veterans Clinic has played an active role in both of these pending cases as amicus counsel.

  • Soto Petition
  • Soto Mizzou Amicus
  • Soto Appx

The pending Soto v. US petition highlights a recurring philosophical divide between Federal Circuit Judges Hughes and Reyna, with Hughes taking a formalist approach requiring specific statutory language while Reyna advocates for a more functional analysis that favors the underdog (disabled veterans). This post first walks through the Soto case and pending petition and then delves a bit deeper into the contrast between these two leading jurists at the Federal Circuit.

Continue reading this post on Patently-O.

A Tale of Two Dewberries: Corporate Structure vs. Trademark Remedies
4 November 2024 | 11:32 pm

by Dennis Crouch

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers (No. 23-900) in December 2024, addressing the trademark-specific question of whether courts can disgorge profits earned not by the defendant itself, but also by legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.  In many ways, I see this case largely as a corporate "structure of the firm" case.  Does trademark law permit business owners to formally structure their set of closely related businesses to avoid spillover liability?  Most notably, corporate attorneys are regularly looking at ways to divide companies to limit spillover liability. The golden target is to create low-profit (or non-profit) entities that hold all the potential liability; and then shift profits to other corporate affiliates that do not have any liability.  In the trademark sense, you may have a media holding company that does all the infringing advertising; and then a set of franchisees that don't do any advertising themselves, but do reap the profits.

Background: The Dewberry dispute involves two real estate-related companies: Dewberry Group (defendant/petitioner) and Dewberry Engineers (mark-holder/respondent). After finding that Dewberry Group had infringed Dewberry Engineers' trademarks, the district court ordered Dewberry Group to disgorge nearly $43 million in profits.

Continue reading this post on Patently-O.

Supreme Court Asked to Address Constitutionality of Judge Newman Removal
4 November 2024 | 1:37 pm

by Dennis Crouch

Miller Mendel, Inc. has petitioned the Supreme Court to review a Federal Circuit decision invalidating its background check software patent in a case that raises questions about both judicial independence and patent eligibility standards. The petition comes after both the district court and Federal Circuit found Miller Mendel's US Patent No. 10,043,188 ineligible under § 101 as directed to an abstract idea.

  • Petition: PetitionforWrit
  • Prior Post on the Case: Dennis Crouch, Alice Backs Anna: Federal Circuit Finds Miller Mendel’s Background Check Patent Abstract, Patently-O (July 18, 2024)

The Patent and Technology at Issue: The '188 patent covers a software system for managing pre-employment background investigations. The claimed system automates many aspects of the background check process, including collecting and storing applicant information, managing communications with references via email hyperlinks, and automatically generating suggested lists of law enforcement agencies based on an applicant's residential address.  Miller Mendel accused the City of Anna police department (northern Texas) of infringement through its use of Guardian Alliance Technologies' background check platform. The City successfully moved for judgment on the pleadings arguing patent ineligibility under § 101. 

Continue reading this post on Patently-O.

While one of only three Electrical Engineer attorneys at his previous firm, the firm was ranked #2 in the U.S. for quality of Electrical Patents by PatentRatings, LLC. Deepak Malhotra has developed relationships with litigators and has assisted clients with aggressive enforcement of intellectual property. Software patents, business method patents, electrical patents, and mechanical patents are his specialties.

Deepak Malhotra Is Not Just A Patent Attorney,
He Is An Inventor Too, With Two U.S. Patents In His Name.